Powered By Blogger

Sunday, December 26, 2010

kickinbrick: Scott Veerkamp Misrepresents The Public

Loan Steering:  The Center for Responsible Lending estimates that excessive interest rates cost families $2.9 billion each year.  CRL states:  "When a borrower loses a home to foreclosure, society pays the price in the drop in surrounding property values and LOST TAX REVENUES."

1. Here is the formula:  Yield Spread Premium and excessive interest rates = loss of tax revenues from mortgage defaults.  2. Clearly, this is one of the reasons for the lack of funding in our school systems.  3. I find it Ironic that Scott Veerkamp has not paid his taxes and FTCSC wants to sue the state over a "funding formula."  4. In other words, Scott wants taxpayers to pay for the lawsuit going in---and Scott feels no responsibility to pay his own taxes going out.  5. On a scale of 1-10 Scott Veerkamp's level of integrity is at ZERO.

Monday, December 13, 2010

Monday, December 6, 2010

www.ftcsc: Scott Veerkamp fwix news

Please review this article entitled:  "Elected Officials Who Didn't
Pay Their Taxes." As you might expect, Scott Veerkamp tops the
list...
http://fwix.com/indy/search/scott+veerkamp+owes+taxes

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Warning Letter To Scott Veerkamp From The Office Of The Indiana Attorney General

Here is the warning letter to Scott Veerkamp:
 
 
Scott Veerkamp is the President of the Franklin Township School Board and a member of the National Association of Realtors.  Please ask Scott to post a copy of his WARNING letter from the office of the Indiana Attorney General.  In addition, please encourage Scott to provide a written response to items 1-16 on this website.

Items 1-8 in group A:  1.  I have documentation of a WARNING letter that was sent to Scott Veerkamp from the office of the Indiana Attorney General.  2. This letter was sent to Scott in November of 2008.  3. Here are the questions I have regarding this letter:  A.  Is a WARNING letter supposed to be an example of how Scott Veerkamp was "exonerated" by the office of the Indiana Attorney General?  B. Can Scott post a copy of his WARNING letter for the public to review?  4. Please explain how a $1,440 Yield Spread Premium "protects and promotes the interest of your client."  FYI:  The federal government has banned the use of YSP.  5. Please explain how a $4,799 Yield Spread Premium "Serves Others First."  This is in reference to your OTHER client in Wanamaker, IN.  6. Please provide documentation that shows how you "protected and promoted the interest of your client" when you attempted to sell a $120,000 property on a land contract with a "due on sale clause."  7.  Please explain how you honored your fiduciary responsibility to your client when you made approximately $26,000 on a $120,000 property listed with REMAX Central in your own neighborhood.  8.  Please provide documentation that shows how you "did your very best" when you refused to conduct an open house on a property located "one block down the street" from the house you were living in.
 
Items 9-16 in group B:  9. Apparently, $26,000 was not enough money to justify Scott driving "one block down the street" to conduct an open house on the $120,000 property.  10. David Worley used to work for Scott Veerkamp at REMAX Central.  Scott had an appraisal conducted on the $120,000 property in response to my complaint.  The appraisal was conducted by Bill Worley.  Are David Worley and Bill Worley related?  11. Scott refers to me as licensed real estate agent.  I would like for Scott to provide documentation that supports this statement.  12. Please explain why you removed my property from the multiple listing service after I filed my complaint with MIBOR.  How was I supposed to sell this property if you refuse to conduct an open house?  How was I supposed to sell this property if you remove it from the MLS?  13. The National Association of Mortgage Brokers stated it is not necessary to pay an application fee.  Please explain how a $960 application fee keeps the interest of your client "first and foremost."  14. NAMB says processing fees are a violation of their code of ethics because "they're generally not related to any actual service performed by a broker."  Please explain how a $500 processing fee "protects and promotes the interest of your client."  15. Scott ran an advertisement in Christian Phone Book with the following statement:  "We will do our very best to help you get the lowest possible interest rates at the lowest possible price."  A. Please provide documentation that explains how a $4,799 Yield Spread Premium represents "the lowest possible interest rate."  B. Likewise, please explain how a $960 application fee represents "the lowest possible price."  16. ISBA Code of Ethics:  Please provide documentation that shows how you "met the responsibilities to your community" when you steered people into high cost loans. 
 
I look forward to a written response from Scott Veerkamp on items 1-16.
 
 
Jim Bruggenschmidt
 
 
NAR:  "How To Avoid Predatory Lending"
 
The Center For Responsible Lending:
 
 
Jeff Merkley and Yield Spread Premium:
 

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

YSP is listed on your settlement statement...

You can find Yield Spread Premium on your settlement statement. It
will be listed as P.O.C. or "paid outside of closing." This shows the
$ amount of the "kickback" your broker received for inflating your
interest rate.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

myftef.org: Scott Veerkamp Con Game

Re: Franklin Township Education Foundation

When I filed my initial complaint with REMAX of Indiana, Jonathan
Nicholas had the following designations: NAR, CRB, CRS, and GRI.
As I mentioned earlier, my initial complaint included documentation of
Loan Steering and Predatory Lending. Likewise, I informed Jonathan
that Scott Veerkamp removed my property from the MLS without my
permission.

Please review this important information:
1. Jonathan Nicholas refused to meet with me and discuss my experience
with the REMAX Central Sting Operation. 2. Scott Veerkamp made
approximately $26,000 on a $120,000 property with a "land contract
scam." 3. Scott refused to conduct an open house on this property.
4. Scott lived "one block down the street" from this property. 5.
Jonathan Nicholas presented Scott Veerkamp with a "Lifetime
Achievement Award" for misrepresenting the value of this property and
stealing my money. 6. Scott used the award to recognize himself with
another advertisement in Christian Phone Book. 7. Apparently, this is
supposed to be an example of how to "protect and promote the interest
of your client." 8. In reality, this felt like a "mafia hit" on
behalf of the REMAX organization. 9. This "mafia hit" included the
following components: A. Loan Steering B. Predatory Lending C.
Inflated property value D. Land contract with a "due on sale" clause.
E. $26,000 "heist" for Scott Veerkamp...
REMAX agent David Bickell was the President of the Metropolitan
Indianapolis Board of Realtors (local association) in 2008. Likewise,
REMAX agent Dick Gaylord was the President of the National Association
of Realtors in 2008. Clearly, there is a "pattern of deception"
emerging with REMAX, NAR, and Loan Steering.

Please take time to review this example of Scott Veerkamp's deception:
"You can trust our Realtors to always keep your interest first and
foremost."

Loan 1: (Property value $150,000) A. $4,799 yield spread premium B.
$500 processing fee C. $250 document preparation fee D. $50 courier
fee E. $35 electronic filing fee F. $425 administration fee (lender
fee)

Loan 2: (Property value $120,000) A. $1,440 yield spread premium B.
$960 application fee C. $1,920 in "discount points" (paid to Scott
Veerkamp) D. $409 administration fee (lender fee) E. $150
underwriting fee (lender fee)

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

myftef.org: Scott Veerkamp Predatory Lending

Predatory Lending is a major contributor to the economic turmoil we are currently experiencing.
Here is an example of what I am talking about: 
Scott Veerkamp / Predatory Lending  (Franklin Township School Board Member.)
Please review this information from U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley regarding deceptive lending practices:
"Steering payments were made to brokers who enticed unsuspecting homeowners into deceptive and expensive mortgages.  These secret bonus payments, often called Yield Spread Premiums, turned home mortgages into a SCAM."
The Center for Responsible Lending says YSP "steals equity from struggling families."   
1. Scott collected nearly $10,000 on two separate mortgages using YSP and junk fees. 2. This is an average of $5,000 per loan. 3. The median value of the properties was $135,000.  4. Clearly, this type of lending represents a major ripoff for consumers.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

myftef.org: Scott Veerkamp Loan Steering

Predatory Lending is a major contributor to the economic turmoil we are currently experiencing.
 
Here is an example of what I am talking about: 
Scott Veerkamp / Predatory Lending  (Franklin Township School Board Member.)
 
Please review this information from U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley regarding deceptive lending practices:
"Steering payments were made to brokers who enticed unsuspecting homeowners into deceptive and expensive mortgages.  These secret bonus payments, often called Yield Spread Premiums, turned home mortgages into a SCAM."
 
The Center for Responsible Lending says YSP "steals equity from struggling families."   
1. Scott collected nearly $10,000 on two separate mortgages using YSP and junk fees. 2. This is an average of $5,000 per loan. 3. The median value of the properties was $135,000.  4. Clearly, this type of lending represents a major ripoff for consumers.
 

Monday, October 18, 2010

Scott Veerkamp: Deceptive Advertising

In doing some research on the Code of Ethics, I found the following
information listed on the RE/MAX International website: "The REALTOR
you hire adheres to a strict Code of Ethics and professionalism while
protecting ownership of property." "In the U.S., all of our agents
are members of their local REALTOR board and uphold the associated
strict Code of Ethics."

Please be advised that I am providing evidence of "Bait and Switch"
advertising on behalf of Scott Veerkamp and his organization. Scott
and his company ran the following advertisement in Christian Phone
Book: "We will do our very best to help you get the lowest interest
rates possible at the lowest possible price."

Upon review, you will see two examples of "Bait and Switch"
advertising in this message. Please take time to review the following
examples...

Example #1: A $4,799 Yield Spread Premium does NOT represent "the
lowest possible interest rate." Again, I refer you to the Center for
Responsible Lending and their definition of Yield Spread Premium: "A
YSP is a cash bonus that a broker receives from a lender for placing
borrowers in a loan with a HIGHER interest rate than the lender would
accept. The higher the interest rate, the higher the premium received
by the broker." "The effect of YSP is to steal equity from struggling
families."

Example #2: A $960 application fee does NOT represent the "lowest
possible price." As discussed earlier, the National Association of
Mortgage Brokers says it is not necessary to pay an application fee.
Therefore, "the lowest possible price" for an application fee is ZERO.
With regard to advertising, the Better Business Bureau defines "Bait
and Switch" in the following manner: "A "bait" offer is an alluring
but insincere offer to sell a product or service which the advertiser
does not intend to sell. Its purpose is to SWITCH consumers from
buying the advertised merchandise or service, in order to sell
something else, usually at a HIGHER price or on a basis more
advantageous to the advertiser."

After reading this description, it is evident Scott Veerkamp meets all
of the requirements for "Bait and Switch" advertising. Here are 4 key
points to review: 1. Obviously, Scott was not sincere about offering
"the lowest possible interest rate" or "the lowest possible price" to
his clients. 2. He simply used these statements as "bait." 3. In the
next step, Scott "switches" his clients to Yield Spread Premium and
junk fees. 4. Clearly, these HIGHER fees are more advantageous to the
advertiser.

In doing some additional research on the Code of Ethics, I found the
following information listed on the Metropolitan Indianapolis Board of
Realtors website: 1. "REALTORS shall be careful at all times to
present a true picture in their advertising and their representations
to the public." 2. "The Code of Ethics is a promise to the public
that when dealing with a real estate agent who is a REALTOR, they can
expect honest and ethical treatment in all transaction- related
matters." 3. "Only REALTORS pledge to abide by the Code of Ethics,
and only REALTORS are held accountable for their ethical behavior."

Previously, Scott Veerkamp deliberately misled the public when he
presented the following statement on one of his websites: "As a
Christian business owner, it truly is the desire of my heart to not be
a "Superstar," but rather a "Super Servant" with the hope of achieving
excellence by keeping the interest of my clients above all else."

Please note: Yield Spread Premium and Junk Fees represent the extreme
opposite of the statement listed above. In fact, Predatory Lending
puts the public at risk for serious financial harm. Unfortunately,
this is the same public Scott Veerkamp claims to be "Serving."

Saturday, October 16, 2010

Countrywide Home Loans / Worst Company Hall Of Fame...

Countrywide Home Loans, NAR, and Predatory Lending

The Indiana Attorney General sued Countrywide Home Loans for deception and Predatory Lending in 2008.  Therefore, you may find it strange that Indiana NAR members recognized Countrywide as a "Platinum Sponsor" in 2009.

Please review this article about Countrywide Home Loans...

Obviously, this information makes it difficult for NAR to say Countrywide Home Loans "protects and promotes the interest of their clients."  As you can see, NAR consistently uses the Code of Ethics to mislead the public.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Wells Fargo, NAR, and Predatory Lending

As discussed, Wells Fargo is nationally recognized for their Predatory Lending tactics in the subprime market.  Did you know that members of the National Association of Realtors recognized this company as a "Platinum Sponsor" in 2009?

Please review these articles about Wells Fargo...

Obviously, this information makes it difficult for NAR to describe Wells Fargo as a company that "protects and promotes the interest of their clients."  

In my personal experience, NAR could care less about protecting the client. Their number one priority is to protect the interest of their personal bank accounts.  For this reason, NAR should revise the Code of Ethics and replace the "Golden Rule" with the "Greedy Rule."

Monday, October 11, 2010

NAR: Golden Rule... or Greedy Rule ?

I have discovered an interesting fact about the National Association of Realtors.  When money is involved, the "Golden Rule" is quickly transformed into the "Greedy Rule."

Here are two examples...

Loan 1:  (Property value $150,000)  A. $4,799 yield spread premium  B. $500 processing fee  C. $250 document preparation fee  D. $50 courier fee  E. $35 electronic filing fee  F. $425 administration fee (lender fee)  

Loan 2:  (Property value $120,000)  A. $1,440 yield spread premium  B. $960 application fee  C. $1,920 in "discount points" (paid to Scott Veerkamp)  D. $409 administration fee (lender fee)  E. $150 underwriting fee (lender fee)  

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Media Censorship, YSP, and Predatory Lending

The local media will not cover my story on YSP because REMAX spends a lot of money advertising with major media outlets.  For obvious reasons, REMAX wants to keep this information hidden from the public.  In my personal opinion, this represents an example of "media censorship."

As you know, Scott Veerkamp was allowed to express his thoughts and feelings about Toni Morrison in the traditional media.  He referred to her book (Song of Solomon) as "garbage."  Freedom of speech allows Scott to express himself in this manner.

Unfortunately, I have not been allowed to express my thoughts about Scott Veerkamp in the traditional media.  To date, I have been forced to communicate my information in the following manner:  1. Hard copy documentation  2. Email  3. Blogs  4. Twitter

You are probably wondering if I have contacted "investigative reporters" with this information.  The answer is yes...

It is obvious their voice has been silenced by REMAX and "Big Corporate Money."  The media knows I have mounds of documentation to support the information in my articles.  Nonetheless, the traditional media refuses to cover this story.

This is my belief:  If you can prove you are telling the truth, the public has a right to hear your voice.

In fact, this is the perfect example of Wall Street versus Main Street.  In this case, "Big Corporate Money" has used its influence to keep this information out of the media.  In other words, they want the people on Main Street to absorb the financial repercussions of this scam.

Here are the questions I have regarding the mortgage meltdown:  A. What keeps us from bailing out the people that were ripped-off and lied to by Predatory Lenders?  B. Why do we keep bailing out Wall Street firms that were preying on consumers?

Essentially, the government is rewarding Wall Street for preying on the public.  The consumer gets burned in two different ways:  1. Predatory Lending:  In the beginning, consumers were misrepresented with deceptive mortgages that were difficult to understand.  As you know, these mortgages were loaded with Junk Fees, Yield Spread Premium, and Prepayment Penalties.  2. The bailouts:  In the next step, the victims in this scenario were asked to bailout the companies that initiated the Predatory Lending.

Here is an example of what I am talking about:  Wells Fargo is nationally recognized for their Predatory Lending tactics in the subprime market.  They consistently used deception to steal equity from the public.  Nonetheless, the government gave Wells Fargo $25 billion in bailout funds.  The victims in this scenario received nothing from the government---yet they were asked to support the bailout. 

In summary, it is obvious that "deception" has played a critical role in this financial crisis.  Clearly, no one would agree to pay a higher interest rate if they understood the financial impact it was having on their loan...


Scott Veerkamp (NAR):  "You can trust our Realtors to always keep your interest first and foremost."

Loan 1:  (Property value $150,000)  A. $4,799 yield spread premium  B. $500 processing fee  C. $250 document preparation fee  D. $50 courier fee  E. $35 electronic filing fee  F. $425 administration fee (lender fee)  

Loan 2:  (Property value $120,000)  A. $1,440 yield spread premium  B. $960 application fee  C. $1,920 in "discount points" (paid to Scott Veerkamp)  D. $409 administration fee (lender fee)  E. $150 underwriting fee (lender fee) 

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

www.ftcsc: Scott Veerkamp / Deceptive Lending

Upon review of my documentation, you will see that Scott Veerkamp must have "skipped class" the day they held ethics training at the National Association of Realtors.

NAR and the Center For Responsible Lending produced a brochure entitled:  "How to Avoid Predatory Lending."  Please take a moment to review this information from the NAR website...

http://www.realtor.org/home_buyers_and_sellers/how_to_avoid_predatory_lending

NAR says:  "Here are some common problems with predatory loans."  (I have included examples from my personal experience with Scott Veerkamp.) 

1. High interest rates and fees: 
Example A:  $960 application fee.  Example B:  $500 processing fee.  As discussed earlier, the National Association of Mortgage Brokers says it is not necessary to pay "application" fees and "processing" fees.  Therefore, the cost of these items should be ZERO as opposed to $1,460. 

2. Loan "Steering": 
Example A:  $4,799 Yield Spread Premium.  Example B:  $1,440 Yield Spread Premium.  The Center for Responsible Lending states the following with regard to Yield Spread Premium:  YSP is "a bonus a lender pays to reward a mortgage broker for placing or "steering" a borrower into a higher-cost loan than the borrower qualifies for."  "Yield Spread Premiums are a destructive feature of the subprime market because they give brokers an incentive to act contrary to a borrowers best interest."  "The effect of YSP is to steal equity from struggling families." 

3. Broken promises, "Bait and Switch.": 
Example A:  "As qualified professionals, we'll guide you through the entire home buying experience and assist you in being an educated buyer."  Example B:  "We will do our very best to help you get the lowest interest rates possible at the lowest possible price."  Example C:  "You can trust our REALTORS to always keep your interest first and foremost."  Example D:  "Keeping the interest of my clients above all else."  Example E:  "Serving Others First."  Example F:  REALTORS are required to "protect and promote the interest of the client" at all times.  Example G:  REALTORS are required to follow the "Golden Rule" at all times.  Example H:  "The term REALTOR has come to connote competency, fairness, and high integrity."

In addition, NAR says you should ask the following question:  "Does the lender belong to a trade association with ethics requirements for members"?  In my case, the answer is yes.  Scott Veerkamp is a member of MIBOR and the National Association of Realtors.

The article also encourages people to do the following:  "Share predatory lending "horror" stories with regulators, other consumers, REALTORS, counseling groups, housing professionals, and the media."  As everyone knows, I have taken their advice on this issue.  I believe it is important for consumers to be aware of Predatory Lending tactics in their community.

In closing, please review the articles below from the Center for Responsible Lending.  This will give you a better understanding of the "Bait and Switch" tactics some brokers use when misrepresenting their clients.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

www.ftcsc: Scott Veerkamp / Predatory Broker

Please review this information from U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley regarding deceptive lending practices.  Senator Merkley makes the following statement in his letter to the President:

"Steering payments were made to brokers who enticed unsuspecting homeowners into deceptive and expensive mortgages.  These secret bonus payments, often called yield spread premiums, turned home mortgages into a SCAM."

In addition, Senator Merkley references an article in the New York Times entitled "Predatory Brokers."  The article makes two important statements regarding predatory lending:  1. "The first step must be to outlaw the kickbacks that lenders pay brokers for steering clients into costlier loans."  2.  "The most clearly unethical form of payment is the so-called yield spread premium." 

NAR members are supposed to help their clients avoid predatory lending tactics.  The code of ethics requires them to follow the "Golden Rule" in the representation of their clients. 

If Scott Veerkamp was applying for a loan, would he select a mortgage that is loaded with yield spread premium and junk fees?  The answer to this question is obvious.  Unfortunately, Scott refuses to comply with the "do unto others" philosophy in the code of ethics.  He uses NAR as a selling tool to build trust with his clients. 

After gaining trust, he "blindsides" his clients with YSP so he can receive a kickback on their loan.

This concept is called "steering" and it can be very costly for consumers.  No one would agree to a higher interest rate if they understood the financial impact it was having on their loan.  This is why Senator Merkley refers to yield spread premium as a "secret bonus payment."

Please take a moment to review two examples of predatory lending using YSP and junk fees: 
Loan 1:  (Property value $150,000)  A. $4,799 yield spread premium  B. $500 processing fee  C. $250 document preparation fee  D. $50 courier fee  E. $35 electronic filing fee  F. $425 administration fee (lender fee)  
Loan 2:  (Property value $120,000)  A. $1,440 yield spread premium  B. $960 application fee  C. $1,920 in "discount points" (paid to Scott Veerkamp)  D. $409 administration fee (lender fee)  E. $150 underwriting fee (lender fee) 

I have provided documentation Scott collected nearly $10,000 on two separate mortgages using YSP and junk fees.  This is an average of $5,000 per loan.  This type of lending represents the extreme opposite of "protecting the interest of the client." 

As I mentioned earlier, predatory lending can cause serious financial harm to the unsuspecting public.  Therefore, I agree with Senator Merkley when he says yield spread premium has turned the home mortgage industry into a "SCAM."

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Jonathan Nicholas and The REMAX Central Sting Operation...

When I filed my initial complaint with REMAX of Indiana, Jonathan Nicholas had the following designations:  NAR, CRB, CRS, and GRI.

As I mentioned earlier, my initial complaint included documentation of Loan Steering and Predatory Lending.  Likewise, I informed Jonathan that Scott Veerkamp removed my property from the MLS without my permission.

Please take time to review this important information:
1. Jonathan Nicholas refused to meet with me and discuss my experience with the REMAX Central Sting Operation.  2. Scott Veerkamp made approximately $26,000 on a $120,000 property with a "land contract scam."  3. Scott refused to conduct an open house on this property.  4. Scott lived "one block down the street" from this property.  5. Jonathan Nicholas presented Scott Veerkamp with a "Lifetime Achievement Award" for misrepresenting the value of this property and stealing my money.  6. Scott used the award to recognize himself with another advertisement in Christian Phone Book.  7. Apparently, this is supposed to be an example of how to "protect and promote the interest of your client."  8. In reality, this felt like a "mafia hit" on behalf of the REMAX organization.  9. This "mafia hit" included the following components:  A. Loan Steering  B. Predatory Lending  C. Inflated property value  D. Land contract with a "due on sale" clause.  E. $26,000 "heist" for Scott Veerkamp.

The information above provides additional documentation that REMAX and the National Association of Realtors are participating in a "pattern of deception" with the public.

Thursday, September 30, 2010

MIBOR: Code of Ethics "Bait and Switch"

Scott Veerkamp removed my property from the MLS after I filed a complaint with MIBOR.  After spending some time reviewing my options, I contacted another REMAX agency to see if they would put my property back on the market.  The REMAX agency I contacted refused to list my property.

It is important to note that I was not living in this property.  The people at MIBOR and REMAX knew it was costing me $1,000 per month.  They seemed to feel it was permissible for Scott Veerkamp to remove my property from the MLS without my permission.  In other words, MIBOR and REMAX declined to offer me any assistance in this difficult situation. 

They watched Scott Veerkamp's sting operation collect $26,000 at my expense.  This is another example of MIBOR using the "Golden Rule" as a bait and switch tactic.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

REMAX Central: Open House ?

Scott Veerkamp had an "open houses" link on a previous website.  Nonetheless, he refused to conduct an open house on the property I listed with him in Wanamaker, IN.  (Property value $120,000)

Scott lived in the same neighborhood where the property was listed. This is the same property he used to collect approximately $26,000 in profit with his "Bait and Switch" strategy.  This deceptive strategy involved a land contract with a "due on sale clause."  As I mentioned earlier, this experience felt like a "mafia hit" on behalf of The REMAX Central Sting Operation.

Apparently, Scott felt $26,000 was not enough money to justify "driving one block down the street" to conduct an open house.  As you might expect, REMAX of Indiana presented Scott Veerkamp with a "Lifetime Achievement Award" for his effort in collecting $26,000 at my expense. 

Please note:  Jonathan Nicholas (NAR) was informed about the shady business tactics of Scott Veerkamp.  I included documentation of Loan Steering and Predatory Lending in the complaints I filed with his office.  Jonathan Nicholas presented Scott Veerkamp with additional "awards" after reviewing evidence that REMAX Central was preying on the unsuspecting public.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Email response from REMAX agent Dick Gaylord / NAR President 2008

Please review my email and the response I received from Dick Gaylord (NAR.)  As I said before, this is a mass scale "Bait and Switch" operation with REMAX and the National Association of Realtors.  

Jim,
    The process for ethics complaints works where there are complaints within the jurisdiction of the Association.
    As you mentioned to me you have taken your complaint to numerous entities and none will take it on.
    I am sorry I cannot help.  This matter falls under the jurisdiction of the local association and I have no authority to get involved.
    I wish you the best in your future real estate endeavors.  My personal advise:  don't let this consume you;  get on with your business and life.
    I am off to D.C. for NAR's midyear meetings.
         Dick Gaylord

 ----- Original Message -----
From: "jim bruggenschmidt"
Sent: 05/10/2008 07:31 AM AST
Subject: NAR Ethics Complaint

Attn:  Mr. Dick Gaylord / NAR President

I have contacted several different members of the Indiana Association
of Realtors (State Board.)  In addition, I have contacted a member of
the Board of Directors with MIBOR.  To date, I have not found anyone
willing to discuss my complaint with me.  As you know, NAR members say
they are dedicated to "protecting and promoting the interest of the
client."

I have not found this to be the case in Indiana.  Unfortunately, it
would appear that Scott Veerkamp continues to use "predatory lending"
tactics with his customers.  As you know from reading my letter, there
is a possibility that Scott has caused financial harm to over 1,000
clients in the last 5 years with the use of YSP.

I find this information to be disturbing...

Sincerely,

Jim Bruggenschmidt


Monday, September 27, 2010

REMAX: "Team Building"

Scott Veerkamp had the following statement on a previous website...

"Scott is nationally recognized by REMAX International and has been featured as a speaker on Team Building on the REMAX training system that was broadcast to REMAX offices nationwide."

Here are the questions I have regarding this statement: 
1. Was Scott Veerkamp teaching REMAX realtors how to use their clients as a "profit center" at closing?  2. Is manipulation and deception part of the "Team Building" process at REMAX International?  3. Was Predatory Lending and YSP included as part of the training system?

I find it strange that REMAX continued to recognize Scott with specific awards when they knew he was preying on the unsuspecting public.

Sunday, September 26, 2010

YSP and Prepayment Penalties

Please review these two statements from the Center for Responsible Lending regarding YSP and prepayment penalties...

Yield Spread Premium:  1. "Many lenders pay this premium---essentially a kickback to brokers---only when the loan has a prepayment penalty that helps trap the borrower in the higher-cost loan long enough for the lender to recoup the cost of the payment to the broker."

2. "Because YSP's encourage prepayment penalties, these kickbacks not only make loans more expensive from the beginning, they also effectively penalize borrowers for developing good credit over time."

Obviously, this information makes it difficult for NAR to say Yield Spread Premium "protects and promotes the interest of the client."

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Excessive Interest Rates

The Center for Responsible Lending estimates that excessive interest rates cost families $2.9 billion each year.  CRL states:  "When a borrower loses a home to foreclosure, society pays the price in the drop in surrounding property values and lost tax revenues."

Perhaps this is one of the reasons for the lack of funding in our school systems...

Friday, September 24, 2010

ISBA Code of Ethics

The Indiana School Boards Association has the following statement written in their Code of Ethics:  "A School Board member should meet his responsibilities to his community."

Is Scott Veerkamp meeting his responsibilities to his community when he "steers" people into high cost loans? 

Thursday, September 23, 2010

NAMB: Code of Ethics

Please review this information regarding the National Association of Mortgage Brokers policy on processing and administration fees: 

NAMB says processing and administration fees are a violation of their Code of Ethics "because they are generally not related to any actual service performed by a broker."
In addition, NAMB says it is not necessary to pay an application fee on your mortgage.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

www.ftcsc: Scott Veerkamp / Preying On Consumers

David Knight, David Wright, and Sheryl Owen grabbed a "ringside seat" at REMAX Central closings.  They helped Scott Veerkamp prey on the unsuspecting public with deceptive lending tactics.

I find it interesting that Scott refers to himself as a Christian Businessman.  He wants people in his community to believe he is praying for them.  In reality, he is preying on them.  Please do not be fooled when he describes himself as a "Christian Super Servant."

Upon review, you will see he uses the following entities to gain trust with the public:  1. NAR Code of Ethics.  2. ISBA Code of Ethics.  3. Indian Creek Christian Church.  4. Christian Phone Book. 

In my personal experience, Scott will literally say anything to gain access to your money.  Here is the perfect example:  "You can trust our REALTORS to always keep your interest first and foremost." 

Again, a $4,799 Yield Spread Premium represents the extreme opposite of this statement.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Scott Veerkamp's "Switching" Technique

"Going In and Going Out" is a term I use to describe the mortgage
transaction I had with Scott Veerkamp. This term is synonymous with
Bait and Switch. Please take a moment to review the following
explanation:

The "Going In" phase typically represents a statement from Scott's
website or his affiliation with NAR. As I mentioned earlier, this
statement is often used as "BAIT."

The "Going Out" phase shows the financial result for his client. As
you might expect, this is where the "SWITCH" takes place. Please
review the following "Going In and Going Out" examples... ( *
indicates junk fee )

Group A: 1. "Serving Others First" going in---and a $500 "processing
fee" going out.* 2. "Keeping the interest of my clients above all
else" going in---and a $960 "application fee" going out.* 3.
"Dedicated to providing the finest service possible" going in---and a
$150 "underwriting fee" from the lender going out.* 4. Scott
describes himself as a "Super Servant" going in---and Scott
"blindsides" his client with a $4,799 "Yield Spread Premium" going
out. 5. "Protecting and promoting the interest of his client" going
in---and a $409 "administration fee" from the lender going out.* 6.
Following the "Golden Rule" going in--and $1,920 in "discount points"
going out.* 7. "Someone You Can Trust" (public awareness campaign)
going in---and thirteen examples of "deception" and "financial harm"
going out.

Group B: 8. "Be truthful in all communications with the public" going
in---and Scott collects $6,239 in "secret bonus payments" and YSP
going out. 9. "Fairness and high integrity" going in---and a $35
"electronic filing fee" going out.* 10. "We go the extra mile to help
you achieve your goals" going in---and a $425 "administration fee"
from the lender going out.* 11. "We'll make your home buying or
selling experience a pleasant one" going in---and a $250 "document
preparation" fee going out.* 12. "You can trust our REALTORS to
always put your interest first and foremost" going in---and a $1,440
"Yield Spread Premium" going out. 13. "You need a professional team
that understands the industry and is positioned to stay ahead of the
game" going in---and a $50 "courier fee" going out.* 14. "We will do
our very best to help you get the lowest interest rates possible at
the lowest possible price" going in---and a whopping $10,938 in junk
fees and "kickbacks" going out.

Hopefully, this information will give you a better understanding of
Scott's "switching" technique. He consistently does the opposite of
what he says he is going to do. As you can see, he often receives a
large financial sum for "steering" people into high cost loans.
Unfortunately, these large financial gains are coming at the expense
of the public.

In summary: The examples above total $10,938 in junk fees and
kickbacks, or $5,469 per loan. Scott collected $6,239 in Yield Spread
Premium from the lender. As discussed earlier, the Center for
Responsible Lending says YSP "steals equity from struggling families."
Nonetheless, Scott describes this scenario as: "Keeping the interest
of his clients above all else."

Saturday, September 18, 2010

CRL

Legal Information: Yield Spread Premium

We believe that the circumstances surrounding the issuance of Yield
Spread Premiums are potentially actionable under state and federal
laws, as long as the claims are brought within 1 to 2 years from the
occurrence.

Any inquiries can be directed to the following:
Price Waicukauski & Riley LLC
Re: Yield Spread Premiums

The Hammond Block Building
301 Massachusetts Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46204

Scott Veerkamp: Deceiving The Public

I was referred to Scott Veerkamp by a lifelong best friend. My friend
knew Scott from Indian Creek Christian Church.

I must admit, I was shocked when I discovered Scott was a con artist
and a Predatory Lender. Unfortunately, Scott Veerkamp uses
"Christianity" as a tool for gaining trust with the public. As you
know, I have already provided documentatation of "Bait and Switch"
advertising in Christian Phone Book.

Scott deliberately misled the public when he presented the following
statement on one of his websites...

"As a Christian business owner, it truly is the desire of my heart to
not be a "Superstar," but rather a "Super Servant" with the hope of
achieving excellence by keeping the interest of my clients above all
else."

Thursday, September 16, 2010

REMAX Realtors: Disclosure of Yield Spread Premium

Regarding disclosure of Yield Spread Premium, would this be a typical
conversation between a REMAX Realtor and a client?

REMAX Realtor: I can get you a loan at 4.5%, or I can get you a loan
at 5%. I will receive a kickback on the 5% loan for increasing your
interest rate. Which loan do you prefer?

Client: Please give me the 5% loan so you can receive a kickback on
my mortgage. In addition, I want to pay thousands of extra dollars
over the life of my loan so you can deposit the kickback in your bank
account.

REMAX Realtor: Thank you for understanding and appreciating the
benefits of YSP.

Client: You are welcome. As you know, there is a high probability
that REMAX will honor you with a "Lifetime Achievement Award" for your
effort in assisting me with Yield Spread Premium.

REMAX Realtor: You are correct. REMAX requires us to follow a strict
Code of Ethics in the representation of our clients. In fact, we are
required to follow the "Golden Rule" at all times. This is the reason
we are presented with "Lifetime Achievement Awards" each year.

Client: Congratulations on your accomplishments. However, I have one
final question: Should I use Countrywide Home Loans or Wells Fargo to
provide the funding for my predatory loan? I noticed these companies
were listed as "Platinum Sponsors" with members of the National
Association of Realtors.

I think you get the picture... In my opinion, I believe it is more
appropriate to use the word "disguised" when referencing YSP. This is
more realistic than using the word "disclosed."

Why would anyone agree to a higher interest rate if they understood
the financial impact it was having on their mortgage? For obvious
reasons, this is why Senator Merkley refers to Yield Spread Premium as
a "secret bonus payment" and a scam.

Please note: The Center for Responsible Lending and the National
Association of Realtors produced a brochure entitled: "How to Avoid
Predatory Lending." The brochure refers to Yield Spread Premium as
Predatory Lending.

As I mentioned earlier, MIBOR says "Realtors are held accountable for
their ethical behavior." Who is holding REMAX and the National
Association of Realtors accountable for deliberately misleading the
public?

Monday, September 13, 2010

REMAX Agent Pam Aguirre (NAR)

Pam Aguirre is a member of the Metropolitan Indianapolis Board of
Realtors. I mailed a complaint to Pam regarding Scott Veerkamp's
Predatory Lending tactics. The complaint included documentation of
Loan Steering with YSP and Junk Fees. (She refused the delivery of my
complaint.)

This response provides additional evidence that REMAX and the National
Association of Realtors are participating in a "pattern of deception"
with the public. As I mentioned earlier, MIBOR states the following:

1. "REALTORS shall be careful at all times to present a true picture
in their advertising and their representations to the public." 2.
"The Code of Ethics is a promise to the public that when dealing with
a real estate agent who is a REALTOR, they can expect honest and
ethical treatment in all transaction- related matters." 3. "Only
REALTORS pledge to abide by the Code of Ethics, and only REALTORS are
held accountable for their ethical behavior."

The public can expect honest and ethical treatment in all transaction-
related matters...? Clearly, this is a mass scale "Bait and Switch"
operation with REMAX and the National Association of Realtors.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

REMAX Central: $26,000 In Profit On A $120,000 Property

Again, I want to emphasize Scott Veerkamp made approximately $26,000
in profit on a $120,000 property. Please understand this is a real
number. It is not a "misprint."

Scott accomplished this profit using a "Bait and Switch" strategy with
a REMAX Central listing in Wanamaker, IN. This is why I refer to his
company as the REMAX Central Sting Operation. In my personal
experience, this felt like a "mafia hit" on behalf of the REMAX
organization.

I mailed a hard-copy complaint to 13 different contacts affiliated
with the REMAX organization. This includes REMAX of Indiana and REMAX
International. I was consistently "brushed aside" and ignored by
REMAX corporate and members of the National Association of Realtors.
Obviously, Scott Veerkamp was not focused on "protecting the interest
of his clients." In reality, he used his customers as a profit center
to expand his personal bank account.

Please take a moment to review the following information:
1. REMAX of Indiana presented Scott with a "Lifetime Achievement
Award" after reviewing my complaint. 2. My complaint included
documentation of Loan Steering and Predatory Lending. 3. Jonathan
Nicholas (NAR) presented the award to Scott Veerkamp. 4. In return,
Scott used the award to recognize himself with another advertisement
in Christian Phone Book.

Scott Veerkamp: "Bait and Switch" Advertising

Scott ran the following advertisement in Christian Phone Book: "We
will do our very best to help you get the lowest interest rates
possible at the lowest possible price."

As discussed, Yield Spread Premium and Junk Fees represent the
"extreme opposite" of the statement above. In fact, Predatory Lending
puts the public at risk for serious financial harm. This is the same
public Scott Veerkamp claims to be "Serving."

REMAX Agent David Bickell (NAR)

David Bickell was the President of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Board
of Realtors in 2008. According to MIBOR: 1. "REALTORS shall be
careful at all times to present a true picture in their advertising
and their representations to the public." 2. "The Code of Ethics is a
promise to the public that when dealing with a real estate agent who
is a REALTOR, they can expect honest and ethical treatment in all
transaction- related matters." 3. "Only REALTORS pledge to abide by
the Code of Ethics, and only REALTORS are held accountable for their
ethical behavior."

Clearly, there is a "pattern of deception" emerging with REMAX and the
National Association of Realtors...

NAR and Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo is nationally recognized for their Predatory Lending
tactics in the subprime market. Nonetheless, Indiana NAR members
listed this company as a "Platinum Sponsor" in 2009.

NAR and Countrywide Home Loans

The Indiana Attorney General sued Countrywide Home Loans for deception
and Predatory lending in 2008. Nonetheless, Indiana NAR members
recognized Countrywide Home Loans as a "Platinum Sponsor" in 2009.

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Articles Regarding Loan Steering and Predatory Lending

Scott Veerkamp: YSP and Junk Fees

You can review the dollar amount of each Junk Fee on your settlement
statement. Junk Fees will be listed as follows: Application fees,
processing fees, document preparation fees, etc. Yield Spread Premium
will be listed as P.O.C. or "paid outside of closing."

Clearly, these fees do not "protect the interest of the client."
Unfortunatelty, Scott Veerkamp collected large sums of money by
"steering" people into high cost loans with with YSP and Junk Fees.

Please take a moment to review two examples of Predatory Lending and
Loan Steering:
Loan 1: (Property value $150,000) A. $4,799 yield spread premium B.
$500 processing fee C. $250 document preparation fee D. $50 courier
fee E. $35 electronic filing fee F. $425 administration fee (lender
fee)

Loan 2: (Property value $120,000) A. $1,440 yield spread premium B.
$960 application fee C. $1,920 in "discount points" (paid to Scott
Veerkamp) D. $409 administration fee (lender fee) E. $150
underwriting fee (lender fee)

REMAX / Fiduciary Responsibility

REMAX claims their agents have a fiduciary responsibility to their
clients. Are inflated rates and REALTOR "kickbacks" in the best
interest of the client?

Senator Jeff Merkley: Yield Spread Premium and Predatory Lending

Please review this Information from Senator Jeff Merkley regarding
Yield Spread Premium. Senator Merkley refers to YSP as a "secret
bonus payment."

http://merkley.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=A09C6A80-537A-4EB1-83C5-31925F046B6F

Scott Veerkamp: Inflated Interest Rates

Have you ever known anyone that deliberately searches for a higher
interest rate when they want to borrow money? This is what Scott was
doing with Yield Spread Premium. He was helping his clients search
for a higher interest rate.

REMAX Agent Dick Gaylord (NAR)

Dick Gaylord was the President of the National Association of Realtors
in 2008. I told him Scott may have misrepresented over 1,000 people
in a 5 year period with YSP kickbacks.

In fact, I included this information in a written complaint I mailed
to his office in California. To my knowledge, Dick made no effort to
protect the public from Scott Veerkamp's manipulation and deception.

REMAX International

REMAX International was fully aware of Scott Veerkamp's Predatory
Lending tactics. To my knowledge, REMAX corporate made no effort to
protect the public from his abusive lending.

American Liberty Mortgage

Scott Veerkamp's sister (Sheryl) worked for American Liberty Mortgage
in the REMAX Central office at Beech Grove. She helped Scott
implement deceptive lending tactics with YSP and Junk Fees at closing.

Jonathan Nicholas / REMAX of Indiana

Jonathan Nicholas was with REMAX of Indiana when I alerted him about
Scott Veerkamp's Predatory Lending tactics. To my knowledge, REMAX
did nothing to prevent Scott from "stealing equity from struggling
families."

"The REMAX Central Sting Operation"

David Knight and David Wright helped Scott Veerkamp implement his
"Bait and Switch" tactics at closing. REMAX Central deliberately
misrepresented their clients with Yield Spread Premium and Excessive
Fees.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Countrywide and Wells Fargo / Ripping Off Homeowners

REMAX: Scott Veerkamp "Bait and Switch" Tactics

In my case, Scott Veerkamp made approximately $26,000 in profit on a
$120,000 property. He was able to accomplish this profit with a
complex "Bait and Switch" tactic involving the National Association of
Realtors.

It is very important for consumers to be educated about YSP and
"steering" payments to brokers. NAR recommends alerting consumers,
the media, and REALTORS when discovering Predatory Lending tactics in
your community. Therefore, I am taking their advice and forwarding
this information for your review.

Please note: Scott Veerkamp was affiliated with the RE/MAX
organization when I wrote the articles in Ripoff Report. Therefore, I
filed complaints with RE/MAX of Indiana and RE/MAX International
regarding his Predatory Lending tactics. They responded in the
following manner: RE/MAX presented Scott Veerkamp with a "Lifetime
Achievement Award." In return, Scott used the award to recognize
himself with another advertisement in Christian Phone Book.

Countrywide Home Loans / Loan Steering

NAR: "Protecting the Client"...?

NAR says REALTORS are required to "protect and promote the interest of
their client" at all times.

NAR: "Golden Rule"...?

NAR says REALTORS are required to follow the "Golden Rule" at all times.

NAR Code of Ethics

According to NAR: REALTORS are required to "put the interest of the
client ahead of their own at all times."

Center for Responsible Lending: Equity Theft

According to CRL: "The effect of Yield Spread Premium is to steal
equity from struggling families."

Scott Veerkamp: (Franklin Township School Board Member)

Predatory Lending is a major contributor to the economic turmoil we
are currently experiencing.

Here is an example of what I am talking about:
Scott Veerkamp / Predatory Lending (Franklin Township School Board Member.)

Please review this information from U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley
regarding deceptive lending practices:
"Steering payments were made to brokers who enticed unsuspecting
homeowners into deceptive and expensive mortgages. These secret bonus
payments, often called Yield Spread Premiums, turned home mortgages
into a SCAM."

The Center for Responsible Lending says YSP "steals equity from
struggling families."
1. Scott collected nearly $10,000 on two separate mortgages using YSP
and junk fees. 2. This is an average of $5,000 per loan. 3. The median
value of the properties was $135,000. 4. Clearly, this type of
lending represents a major ripoff for consumers.

http://merkley.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=A09C6A80-537A-4EB1-83C5-31925F046B6F

Friday, September 3, 2010

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Scott Veerkamp: NAR / "Bait and Switch" Example

In doing some research on the Code of Ethics, I found the following information listed on the RE/MAX International website: "The REALTOR you hire adheres to a strict Code of Ethics and professionalism while protecting ownership of property." "In the U.S., all of our agents are members of their local REALTOR board and uphold the associated strict Code of Ethics."

As stated earlier, REALTOR Magazine provided the following information in their article regarding mortgage fees: "People should ask their broker how much they're making, including yield spread premiums and direct fees, and if it's over $2,000 they should question why." Please keep this information in mind when reviewing Scott Veerkamp's "switching" technique.

Likewise, I am forwarding information from CNN Money.com regarding junk fees. The article is entitled: "The bunk behind junk closing fees." "Mortgage brokers and their many "fees"--sometimes not related to any actual service performed by a broker."

The article has a list of names that brokers use for various junk fees. Please review this statement contained in the article: "The long list of names that fees go by ( in addition to processing and administration charges, Aquila residents were hit with application, commitment, courier, document prep, origination and underwriting fees) suggests that specific things were done to earn them."

"Actually, says University of Minnesota law professor Prentiss Cox, a former head of the Minnesota attorney general's consumer division, most all of these fees end up in lender or broker coffers regardless of what a HUD-1 says: They should just call them "Pluto research fees." "They're just making this stuff up."

The quote above was taken from the CNN Money.com article. Obviously, Mr. Cox is very specific about his statement on junk fees. I agree with him when he says: "They're just making this stuff up." In fact, "Pluto research fees" is a perfect description for excessive and unnecessary junk fees. Clearly, these fees are not in the best interest of the client.

Please note: "Going In and Going Out" is a term I use to describe the mortgage transaction I had with Scott Veerkamp. This term is synonymous with "Bait and Switch." Please take a moment to review the following explanation...

The "Going In" phase typically represents a statement from Scott's website or his affiliation with NAR. As I mentioned earlier, this statement is often used as "BAIT."

The "Going Out" phase shows the financial result for his client. As you might expect, this is where the "SWITCH" takes place. Please review the following "Going In and Going Out" examples... ( * indicates junk fee / "Pluto fee" )

Group A: 1. "Serving Others First" going in---and a $500 "processing fee" going out.* 2. "Keeping the interest of my clients above all else" going in---and a $960 "application fee" going out.* 3. "Dedicated to providing the finest service possible" going in---and a $150 "underwriting fee" from the lender going out.* 4. Scott describes himself as a "Super Servant" going in---and Scott "blindsides" his client with a $4,799 "Yield Spread Premium" going out. 5. "Protecting and promoting the interest of his client" going in---and a $409 "administration fee" from the lender going out.* 6. Following the "Golden Rule" going in--and $1,920 in "discount points" going out.* 7. "Someone You Can Trust" (public awareness campaign) going in---and thirteen examples of "deception" and "financial harm" going out.

Group B: 8. "Be truthful in all communications with the public" going in---and Scott collects $6,239 in "secret bonus payments" going out. 9. "Fairness and high integrity" going in---and a $35 "electronic filing fee" going out.* 10. "We go the extra mile to help you achieve your goals" going in---and a $425 "administration fee" from the lender going out.* 11. "We'll make your home buying or selling experience a pleasant one" going in---and a $250 "document preparation" fee going out.* 12. "You can trust our REALTORS to always put your interest first and foremost" going in---and a $1,440 "Yield Spread Premium" going out. 13. "You need a professional team that understands the industry and is positioned to stay ahead of the game" going in---and a $50 "courier fee" going out.* 14. "We will do our very best to help you get the lowest interest rates possible at the lowest possible price" going in---and a whopping $10,938 in "Pluto fees" and kickbacks going out.

Hopefully, this information will give you a better understanding of Scott's "switching" technique. He consistently does the opposite of what he says he is going to do. As you can see, he often receives a large financial sum for "steering" people into high cost loans. Unfortunately, these large financial gains are coming at the expense of the public.

In summary: The examples above total $10,938 in junk fees and kickbacks, or $5,469 per loan. Scott collected $6,239 in Yield Spread Premium from the lender. As discussed earlier, Senator Merkley says Yield Spread Premium has turned the home mortgage industry into a SCAM. Nonetheless, Scott describes this scenario as: "Keeping the interest of his clients above all else."

Scott Veerkamp: NAR / Predatory Broker

Please review this information from U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley regarding deceptive lending practices. Senator Merkley makes the following statement in his letter to the President:
"Steering payments were made to brokers who enticed unsuspecting homeowners into deceptive and expensive mortgages. These secret bonus payments, often called yield spread premiums, turned home mortgages into a SCAM."

In addition, Senator Merkley references an article in the New York Times entitled "Predatory Brokers." The article makes two important statements regarding predatory lending: 1. "The first step must be to outlaw the kickbacks that lenders pay brokers for steering clients into costlier loans." 2. "The most clearly unethical form of payment is the so-called yield spread premium."

NAR members are supposed to help their clients avoid predatory lending tactics. The code of ethics requires them to follow the "Golden Rule" in the representation of their clients.

If Scott Veerkamp was applying for a loan, would he select a mortgage that is loaded with yield spread premium and junk fees? The answer to this question is obvious. Unfortunately, Scott refuses to comply with the "do unto others" philosophy in the code of ethics. He uses NAR as a selling tool to build trust with his clients. After gaining trust, he "blindsides" his clients with YSP so he can receive a kickback on their loan.

This concept is called "steering" and it can be very costly for consumers. No one would agree to a higher interest rate if they understood the financial impact it was having on their loan. This is why Senator Merkley refers to yield spread premium as a "secret bonus payment."

Please take a moment to review two examples of predatory lending using YSP and junk fees:

Loan 1: (Property value $150,000) A. $4,799 yield spread premium B. $500 processing fee C. $250 document preparation fee D. $50 courier fee E. $35 electronic filing fee F. $425 administration fee (lender fee)

Loan 2: (Property value $120,000) A. $1,440 yield spread premium B. $960 application fee C. $1,920 in "discount points" (paid to Scott Veerkamp) D. $409 administration fee (lender fee) E. $150 underwriting fee (lender fee)

I have provided documentation Scott collected nearly $10,000 on two separate mortgages using YSP and junk fees. This is an average of $5,000 per loan. This type of lending represents the extreme opposite of "protecting the interest of the client."

As I mentioned earlier, predatory lending can cause serious financial harm to the unsuspecting public. Therefore, I agree with Senator Merkley when he says yield spread premium has turned the home mortgage industry into a "SCAM."

http://merkley.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=A09C6A80-537A-4EB1-83C5-31925F046B6F

Realtor / Predatory Lending Example

The National Association of Realtors and the Center For Responsible Lending produced a brochure entitled: "How to Avoid Predatory Lending." Please take a moment to review this information from the NAR website...

http://www.realtor.org/home_buyers_and_sellers/how_to_avoid_predatory_lending

NAR says: "Here are some common problems with predatory loans." (I have included examples from my personal experience with Scott Veerkamp.)

1. High interest rates and fees:

Example A: $960 application fee. Example B: $500 processing fee. As discussed earlier, the National Association of Mortgage Brokers says it is not necessary to pay "application" fees and "processing" fees. Therefore, the cost of these items should be ZERO as opposed to $1,460.

2. Loan "Steering":

Example A: $4,799 Yield Spread Premium. Example B: $1,440 Yield Spread Premium. The Center for Responsible Lending states the following with regard to Yield Spread Premium: YSP is "a bonus a lender pays to reward a mortgage broker for placing or "steering" a borrower into a higher-cost loan than the borrower qualifies for." "Yield Spread Premiums are a destructive feature of the subprime market because they give brokers an incentive to act contrary to a borrowers best interest." "The effect of YSP is to steal equity from struggling families."

3. Broken promises, "Bait and Switch.":

Example A: "As qualified professionals, we'll guide you through the entire home buying experience and assist you in being an educated buyer." Example B: "We will do our very best to help you get the lowest interest rates possible at the lowest possible price." Example C: "You can trust our REALTORS to always keep your interest first and foremost." Example D: "Keeping the interest of my clients above all else." Example E: "Serving Others First." Example F: REALTORS are required to "protect and promote the interest of the client" at all times. Example G: REALTORS are required to follow the "Golden Rule" at all times. Example H: "The term REALTOR has come to connote competency, fairness, and high integrity." (Statements were taken from various websites and advertising provided by Scott Veerkamp and his organization.)

In addition, NAR says you should ask the following question: "Does the lender belong to a trade association with ethics requirements for members"? In my case, the answer is yes. Scott Veerkamp is a member of MIBOR and the National Association of Realtors.

The article also encourages people to do the following: "Share predatory lending "horror" stories with regulators, other consumers, REALTORS, counseling groups, housing professionals, and the media." As everyone knows, I have taken their advice on this issue. I believe it is important for consumers to be aware of Predatory Lending tactics in their community.

In closing, please review the articles below from the Center for Responsible Lending. This will give you a better understanding of the "Bait and Switch" tactics some brokers use when misrepresenting their clients.

http://www.responsiblelending.org/mortgage-lending/research-analysis/ib-ysp-110507-final.pdf

http://www.responsiblelending.org/mortgage-lending/tools-resources/ib011-YSP_Equity_Theft-0604.pdf

Predatory Lending and the National Association of Realtors.

Please be advised that I am providing evidence of "Bait and Switch" advertising on behalf of Scott Veerkamp and his organization. Scott and his company ran the following advertisement in Christian Phone Book: "We will do our very best to help you get the lowest interest rates possible at the lowest possible price."
Upon review, you will see two examples of "Bait and Switch" advertising in this message. Please take time to review the following examples...

Example #1: A $4,799 Yield Spread Premium does NOT represent "the lowest possible interest rate." Again, I refer you to the Center for Responsible Lending and their definition of Yield Spread Premium: "A YSP is a cash bonus that a broker receives from a lender for placing borrowers in a loan with a HIGHER interest rate than the lender would accept. The higher the interest rate, the higher the premium received by the broker." "The effect of YSP is to steal equity from struggling families."

Example #2: A $960 application fee does NOT represent the "lowest possible price." As discussed earlier, the National Association of Mortgage Brokers says it is not necessary to pay an application fee. Therefore, "the lowest possible price" for an application fee is ZERO.

With regard to advertising, the Better Business Bureau defines "Bait and Switch" in the following manner: "A "bait" offer is an alluring but insincere offer to sell a product or service which the advertiser does not intend to sell. Its purpose is to SWITCH consumers from buying the advertised merchandise or service, in order to sell something else, usually at a HIGHER price or on a basis more advantageous to the advertiser."

After reading this description, it is evident Scott Veerkamp meets all of the requirements for "Bait and Switch" advertising. Here are 4 key points to review: 1. Obviously, Scott was not sincere about offering "the lowest possible interest rate" or "the lowest possible price" to his clients. 2. He simply used these statements as "bait." 3. In the next step, Scott "switches" his clients to Yield Spread Premium and junk fees. 4. Clearly, these HIGHER fees are more advantageous to the advertiser.

In doing some additional research on the Code of Ethics, I found the following information listed on the Metropolitan Indianapolis Board of Realtors website: 1. "REALTORS shall be careful at all times to present a true picture in their advertising and their representations to the public." 2. "The Code of Ethics is a promise to the public that when dealing with a real estate agent who is a REALTOR, they can expect honest and ethical treatment in all transaction- related matters." 3. "Only REALTORS pledge to abide by the Code of Ethics, and only REALTORS are held accountable for their ethical behavior."

Previously, Scott Veerkamp deliberately misled the public when he presented the following statement on one of his websites: "As a Christian business owner, it truly is the desire of my heart to not be a "Superstar," but rather a "Super Servant" with the hope of achieving excellence by keeping the interest of my clients above all else."

Please note: Yield Spread Premium and junk fees represent the extreme opposite of the statement listed above. In fact, Predatory Lending puts the public at risk for serious financial harm. Unfortunately, this is the same public Scott Veerkamp claims to be "Serving."