Scott Veerkamp Predatory Lending: This shows the financial impact Yield Spread Premium has on the homeowner.

Scott Veerkamp is the President of the Franklin Township School Board and a member of the National Association of Realtors. I have documentation of two loans initiated by Scott containing Yield Spread Premium...

Loan 1: Contains a $1,440 Yield Spread Premium on a $120,000 property.

Loan 2: Contains a $4,799 Yield Spread Premium on a $150,000 property.

(a) The following documentation is not an example of a loan initiated by Scott Veerkamp. I am merely providing this example to show the financial impact of YSP on the homeowner.

(b) On average, mortgage brokers receive 1% of the loan amount each time they raise the interest rate .25%. In other words, the lender pays the broker a "kickback" for increasing the interest rate on the loan.

(c) What is the difference in cost between a 6% rate and a 6.5% rate on a $200,000 loan over 30 years? Here is the answer according to bankrate mortgage calculator: -($23,414.40)

(d) On the mortgage above, the broker would receive a $4,000 kickback or (2% of the loan amount) for increasing the interest rate .5%. Therefore, a family would pay an extra -($23,414.40) over 30 years because they did not receive the interest rate they qualified for.

(e) I believe most families would prefer to invest the $23,414.40 in EDUCATION. Clearly, this makes more sense than "wasting it" with a predatory loan.

(f) Therefore, I am asking Scott Veerkamp to answer the following questions: 1. How does Predatory Lending "protect and promote the interest of the client"? 2. How does Yield Spread Premium "keep the interest of the client above all else"?

*You can find YSP on the settlement in your mortgage documents. It will be listed as POC or "paid outside of closing".

RIPOFF: Is Scott Veerkamp honoring his fiduciary responsibility to his clients?

Download Veerkamp_loyalty_and_fiduciary.pdf

On a previous website, Scott posted the following information regarding his commitment to his clients: (a) Loyalty to clients. (b) Fiduciary responsibility to clients. (c) Truthfulness in statements and advertising.

Regarding his statements, please take time to review all the bullet points on his website. Upon review, it is obvious Scott is not being truthful with the information he is presenting. Clearly, Scott is using false statements to mislead the public with "Bait and Switch" tactics.

Here is an example of his deception...
http://narrealtorbaitandswitchblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/consumer-alert-scott-veerkamp-uses.html

Scott Veerkamp is misleading consumers with false information on his websites...

Download Open_house_bait_and_switch.pdf

Scott displayed an "OPEN HOUSES" link on the front page of his website in 2004. This is the same year I purchased the property listed with REMAX Central. Obviously, Scott used the OPEN HOUSES link as a tool for deceiving the public. In my case, he had no intention of conducting an open house.

When comparing the 2004 website to his current website, you will notice the REMAX brand name is missing on his current site.  Apparently, REMAX does not want to have their name associated with Scott Veerkamp when he discusses his work experience in the real estate industry. 

Please note:  Scott refused to drive (one block) to conduct an open house on the Eaton Court property...

http://narrealtorbaitandswitchblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/scott-veerkamp-refuses-to-conduct-open.html

Scott Veerkamp Ripoff Alert: Here is documentation of the money I invested to renovate the Eaton Court property...

Download Expenses_for_renovation.pdf

Here is documentation of the money I invested in the 8202 Eaton Court property. Apparently, Scott thought I invested -($7,300) to renovate this house so he could flip the property at my expense.  (Please scroll to review receipts)

Exposing Scott Veerkamp Real Estate Scams

Download Christian_Phone_Book_SV_testim.pdf

1.  Scott Veerkamp is using Christian Phone Book to deceive the public.

2.  Is Predatory Lending an example of how to be a good "Christian"?

3.  Does a kickback on a predatory loan represent an example of "Serving Others First"?

4.  Scott Veerkamp is an IMPOSTER.  He is using Christian Phone Book to mislead consumers.

5.  Who is that person Scott is talking about in the PDF document?  Is this another individual Scott intends to (prey on) with false information?

Examples of deception, predatory lending, and false advertising:

http://narrealtorbaitandswitchblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/scott-veerkamp-truth-is-in-his-fees.html

Scott Veerkamp Misrepresented My Mortgage Documents

Please take time to review the following information...

I was misrepresented by Scott Veerkamp on my mortgage transaction. Scott had the property set up with a 12 month occupancy agreement when he listed the property.

When you look at Scott's response, he confirms the property is set up for a "flip." A Realtor can not flip a property with a 12 month occupancy agreement.

This is the reason Scott refused to show the property. In addition, this is the reason he refused to conduct an open house.

If Scott sold the property quickly, he would have to answer questions from the lender about violating the occupancy agreement. This is the reason he tried to sell the property on contract. As I said before, there is no mortgage on a land contract. If Scott sold the property on contract, only 3 people would know:  1. Myself  2. Scott  3. Chris Moore

GMAC would not know the property was sold on contract unless I contacted them to get permission. When you review the letter, it is clear GMAC is saying the property can not be sold on contract.

I know this sounds strange. However, the following statement is true: Scott listed a property HE COULD NOT SELL without violating the occupancy agreement.

Please remember: Scott received a WARNING letter from the office of the Indiana Attorney General. This government agency never blamed me for any issues relating to the transaction.

Here are 5 key points to review about the transaction...

1. It does not matter if I lived in the property.

2. It does not matter if the property was vacant.

3. Either way, Scott COULD NOT SELL the property without violating the terms of the occupancy agreement.

4. This is the reason he refused to show the property.

5. In the end, I met the financial requirements of the occupancy agreement. I made all the payments required over the 12 month period. In addition, I made all of my payments on time. For this reason, I did not have anyone from a government agency express concern about the occupancy agreement on my behalf. As many people do, I signed a stack of documents "one inch thick" at closing. I do not remember much about the details of the documents.

Please note: Scott had his mortgage license revoked by the office of the Indiana Secretary of State's Security Division. I do not know the reason his license was revoked. However, here is my documentation...

Mortgage license revoked:

http://narrealtorbaitandswitchblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/scott-veerkamp-alm-group-documentation.html

Here is the reason Scott could not show (or sell) the property...

http://narrealtorbaitandswitchblog.blogspot.com/2012/09/occupancy-agreement.html

The Center for Responsible Lending: Yield Spread Premium and Predatory Lending

Download Seven_Signs_of_Predatory_Lendi.pdf

Please take time to review this document from the Center for Responsible Lending.  CRL and the National Association of Realtors refer to the use of Yield Spread Premium as Predatory Lending.