Here is a copy of Scott's response. It is available on this blog from ripoff report. (You will need to scroll to see this document).
1. Scott says in his response: "It is nice when you have truth on your side and good documentation."
2. Scott is claiming he was "exonerated" by the office of the Indiana Attorney General. If this statement is true, why did he receive a warning letter?
3. Scott says he "went well beyond the call of duty to make amends." Can he provide an example that supports this statement?
4. Scott has chosen an interesting title for his response. Why is he unable to provide evidence he was cleared of ethics violations with the organizations he mentions in his response?
5. Was Scott "completely exonerated" after he flipped his own listing? If he was, this will confirm REMAX and MIBOR are running a scam with the Code of Ethics. (Please see the MIBOR promise).
6. Why is he avoiding a discussion about Yield Spread Premium and the family from Wanamaker?
7. His business was strengthened with my complaints? His company has remitted payment?
8. Scott is claiming I had a "violation of license law" during this transaction. If I had a violation, why did Scott receive the warning letter?
9. As you can see, Scott is encouraging people to contact him with questions about his statements.
10. Please ask him to provide documentation to support his statements.
No comments:
Post a Comment